The electoral college is widely regarded as an anachronism, a nondemocratic method of selecting a president that ought to be superseded by declaring the candidate who receives the most popular. The pro's and con's of the electoral college system there have, in its 200 year history, been a number of critics and proposed reforms to the electoral college system - most of them trying to eliminate it. The winner-take-all system explains why one candidate can get more votes nationwide while a different candidate wins in electoral college these 3 common arguments for preserving the electoral. Established in 1787, the electoral college is as old as the us constitution marquette magazine asked dr paul nolette, assistant professor in the department of political science, why, after 225. Why do we have the electoral college by leon friedman very little attention is being paid to the fact that hillary clinton apparently won the popular vote, even while she lost the electoral vote.
Granted, a few arguments for the electoral college do have the right logical shape-explaining why presidential elections should differ from gubernatorial ones - and thus do not have the flaw of. If we abandoned the electoral college, and adopted a system in which a person could win the presidency with only a plurality of the popular votes we would be swamped with candidates. Best answer: i like that the question asked why we should keep it, rather than whether or not we should keep it that keeps the answers focused on one aspect of it--the benefits the electoral college simplifies the recount process if we based the outcome on popular vote and it was close, it could trigger.
The electoral college was a compromise, neither fully democratic nor aristocratic the constitution states: each state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in the congress. The electoral college helps keep the two-party system strong it makes it very hard for a third party to break through at the national level and increases the risk that a third party could spoil a candidate’s chance of winning, which in turn discourages people from voting for third-party candidates. The electoral college is a large part of what makes this country exceptional, unique, and a republic it is imperative that we protect the electoral college, and ensure that we do all we can to return to the original intent of the united states constitution. Well, there is at least one practical reason why the system should stay as it is, according to judge richard posner the electoral college prevents run-off elections, so it produces a clear winner. Under the electoral college system, it is possible for a presidential candidate to lose the nationwide popular vote, yet be elected president of the united states by winning in only a handful of key states should you ever forget this fact, critics of the electoral college will be sure to remind you.
Why does the united states have an electoral college when it would be so easy to directly elect a president, as we do for all the other political offices when us citizens go to the polls to. In most cases, the electoral college forces candidates to win not just a majority, but a super-majority they can’t just win a majority of individual votes they have to win a majority of votes in a majority of states (or, at least, a majority of large states. I do not think we should have this idiotic voting system known as the electoral college, the electoral college has been failing us, and their is no good reason for why we should keep it. Proponents of the electoral college counter that a national popular vote would shift candidates' focus to urban centers, and the current system protects the interests of rural populations.
Until we get that fix — or even engage in more hands-on electoral reform — we'll have to deal with the electoral college, keeping a close eye on it to make sure it fairly and accurately. I say keep it the way the founding fathers made it with the electoral college and educate the people as to why we need it we also need to teach our people (the legal ones anyway) to vote voting is a priviledge we all have a responsibility to vote. The electoral college should not be abolished because it allows for minority interests in the states to be heard, it limits democracy, and it has worked for over 200 years. The electoral college should continue to be the system of voting used in the us until the country has reached a more secure period and has a well developed plan that would be proven more efficient than the system already in place.
We’ve seen it a few times before: a candidate can become president by winning the electoral college, even if he or she has lost the popular vote the most recent example of this was the 2000 presidential election. Keep the electoral college: our view a national popular vote would bring its own set of problems post to facebook cancel send sent a link has been sent to your friend's email address posted.
- the importance of the electoral college and its effectiveness in today's world when the constitutional convention gathered in 1784 they had the difficult task of determining how our government should be assembled and what systems we should use to elect them. Why we should abolish the electoral college by tyler lewis voting for president of the united states come this november, many of us americans will journey to our specified polling place to cast. For those skeptics, i would point out two other advantages the electoral college offers first, we must keep in mind the likely effects of direct popular election of the president we would.